[MPlayer-users] MPplayer and installing a new gcc version
RC
rcooley at spamcop.net
Tue Oct 26 07:52:12 CEST 2004
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:56:01 -0400
D Richard Felker III <dalias at aerifal.cx> wrote:
> quite the opposite. ffmpeg is massively slower, as in unplayable dvds
> versus playable dvds.
time mplayer -vfm ffmpeg -nocache -benchmark 60\ Minutes\
2004Oct24_19\:00.02.mpeg -vo null -nosound
BENCHMARKs: VC: 488.218s VO: 0.320s A: 0.000s Sys: 113.034s =
601.571s BENCHMARK%: VC: 81.1571% VO: 0.0531% A: 0.0000% Sys: 18.7898%
= 100.0000%
Exiting... (End of file)
real 10m1.853s
user 8m32.410s
sys 0m18.860s
time mplayer -vfm libmpeg2 -nocache -benchmark 60\ Minutes\
2004Oct24_19\:00.02.mpeg -vo null -nosound
BENCHMARKs: VC: 552.462s VO:
0.548s A: 0.000s Sys: 108.868s = 661.879s BENCHMARK%: VC: 83.4688%
VO: 0.0828% A: 0.0000% Sys: 16.4484%= 100.0000%
Exiting... (End of file)
real 11m4.031s
user 9m34.770s
sys 0m20.450s
Call me crazy, but it looks like ffmpeg is faster. At the very
least, ffmpeg sure isn't a lot slower than libmpeg2. That's using
dev-CVS-041008-12:19-3.2.2
More information about the MPlayer-users
mailing list