[MPlayer-users] MPplayer and installing a new gcc version
D Richard Felker III
dalias at aerifal.cx
Tue Oct 26 12:45:32 CEST 2004
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:52:12PM -0700, RC wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:56:01 -0400
> D Richard Felker III <dalias at aerifal.cx> wrote:
>
> > quite the opposite. ffmpeg is massively slower, as in unplayable dvds
> > versus playable dvds.
>
> time mplayer -vfm ffmpeg -nocache -benchmark 60\ Minutes\
> 2004Oct24_19\:00.02.mpeg -vo null -nosound
>
> BENCHMARKs: VC: 488.218s VO: 0.320s A: 0.000s Sys: 113.034s =
> 601.571s BENCHMARK%: VC: 81.1571% VO: 0.0531% A: 0.0000% Sys: 18.7898%
> = 100.0000%
>
> Exiting... (End of file)
>
> real 10m1.853s
> user 8m32.410s
> sys 0m18.860s
>
> time mplayer -vfm libmpeg2 -nocache -benchmark 60\ Minutes\
> 2004Oct24_19\:00.02.mpeg -vo null -nosound
>
> BENCHMARKs: VC: 552.462s VO:
> 0.548s A: 0.000s Sys: 108.868s = 661.879s BENCHMARK%: VC: 83.4688%
> VO: 0.0828% A: 0.0000% Sys: 16.4484%= 100.0000%
>
> Exiting... (End of file)
>
> real 11m4.031s
> user 9m34.770s
> sys 0m20.450s
>
> Call me crazy, but it looks like ffmpeg is faster. At the very
> least, ffmpeg sure isn't a lot slower than libmpeg2. That's using
> dev-CVS-041008-12:19-3.2.2
2 possibilities likely:
1. it's faster on _your_ cpu, not others.
2. gcc3 makes libmpeg2 slower...? :) actually this is very likely..
as i said before, this is not just theoratical bullshit. dvd is
playable with libmpeg2, not playable with ffmpeg, for me!!!
rich
More information about the MPlayer-users
mailing list