[MPlayer-G2-dev] dual licensing try 2

[Gabucino]

D Richard Felker III wrote:
> > > I am from the RMS camp
> > That doesn't mean you shouldn't think.
> We do think. It's you who doesn't think. You just act on greed.
You said yourself that you don't want money from duallicensing, so stop
saying this.


> > It helps the developers.
> It DOES NOT HELP THE DEVELOPERS. Unless you mean paying Arpi and
> possibly yourself
...
Dual-licensing money would be available for every developer - if they (you)
refuse accepting it due to religious RMS-Rulez-Free-Like-Beer/Whatever reasons,
that is entirely your problem.


> He's not saying that WE will be crippling software. Rather, we would
> be auiding proprietary software companies in crippling their software
> (by including DRM, no source code, etc. while taking advantage of
> MPlayer code). This is bad!!
We already do. The only way we won't help them is closing the source entirely.

-- 
Gabucino
MPlayer Core Team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-g2-dev/attachments/20040223/ed175c97/attachment.pgp>