[MPlayer-dev-eng] mingw32 large file support
Rich Felker
dalias at aerifal.cx
Sun Feb 12 21:44:46 CET 2006
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:46:28AM -0600, Joey Parrish wrote:
> > > But, yes, ideally we would all use normal calls and get 64-bit types
> > > automatically. On the other hand, ideally, we wouldn't need this header
> > > to get a unified API, either. :)
> >
> > Well I'm against using the hack api as the unified api. The unified
> > api should be the standard posix api, and systems that are broken
> > should have well-hidden workarounds. This goes with my fundamental
> > principle of workarounds:
> >
> > The workaround must always be placed as close as possible to the
> > broken component that it's working around, and should be totally
> > invisible to non-broken components.
> >
> > Or something like that. It was discussed in a past thread.
>
> Yes, I understand. I just wanted to explain that the decision was not
> without reason. My priority was not accidentally using 32-bit types in
> the project I was creating it for. But for MPlayer, I'd be happy to
> write it the other way.
Excellent, that'd be great. BTW an easy way to make sure you don't
miss any files is to do a search for files that contain one of the
size-dependent types/functions but not the include line.
Rich
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list