[MPlayer-cygwin] Re: compiling mplayer with freetype?
Sven Köhler
skoehler at upb.de
Sun Aug 10 01:16:03 CEST 2003
>>I'd like to improve my skills in compiling mplayer. I remember that you
>>guys released a cygwin-build some time ago. I'd really like mplayer to
>>be part of the official cygwin-distribution. So i'm perhaps going to
>>offer myself on the cygwin-mailinglist to get the mplayer package
>>maintainer.
>
> That would be great.
Well, i didn't ask on the cygwin mailinglist yet. I will do so, if i get
my first real build working.
> The freetype thing is a bit tricky.
I'm really confused at the moment. Although i could compile faad and
freetype i don't get any DLL files. Instead it seems that i get static
libraries although configure says, that the default of "--enable-shared"
is "yes".
I'm not yet sure, if it is better to use DLLs or just link against
static libs. I guess my cygwin mplayer package should be independant as
long as there are no official freetype/faad/libogg packages for cygwin.
> Afair I had to adjust
> freetype-config to get freetype detected by configure.
Well, i don't know what you mean. What is "freetype-config"?
I tried to include the header files with --with-extraincdir and
--with-extralibdir cause i've compiled faad and freetype to /opt/faad
and /opt/freetype (well i know that the opt directory wasn't designed
for that). mplayer's configure could find faad, but is says "no" for
freetype.
> In my opinion a cygwin binary package
> should be
> - compiled with runtime cpudetection
i agree. i already tryed that for my latest builds.
> - binary real, dmo, dshow, quicktime codec support (wait until we applied
> the patch to get them loaded from /usr/local/lib/codecs)
well, that sounds like a lot of work to do for me.
> - freetype support
my builds still lack freetype :-(
> - ogg, faad, libavcodec support
that's seems to be the easiest part.
More information about the MPlayer-cygwin
mailing list