[FFmpeg-soc] [PATCH] Some fast_bilinear patches.

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Mon Jul 27 08:52:55 CEST 2009


On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:27:58AM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Michael Niedermayer<michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:56:34PM -0300, Ramiro Polla wrote:
> >> Attached are some patches for the fast bilinear scaler, while I wait
> >> on Michael's answer on the previous message regarding fast_bilinear.
> >>
> >> Hmm, should these patches go to -devel or -soc?
> >>
> >> Ramiro Polla
> >
> >>  swscale.c |   61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >> d369af493c0c7e0f5d040ed71c1b232cf30a31bc  0001-Avoid-duplication-in-initMMX2HScaler.patch
> >> From 05c4bf02481265155b7d25438e9b32ceefcd578e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Ramiro Polla <ramiro at macbuntu.(none)>
> >> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:56:57 -0300
> >> Subject: [PATCH] Avoid duplication in initMMX2HScaler()
> >
> > might be ok but it isnt particularely readable so iam not sure ...
> 
> What's not readable? The resulting code or the patch? There's

the patch


> currently 1 patch for factorization, then a cleanup which indents and
> changes some {}s, and the last patch (which you didn't comment) is
> unrelated. Should I try adding intermediate steps to make the
> factorization more clear?

if you can easily make it more readable please do

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

In fact, the RIAA has been known to suggest that students drop out
of college or go to community college in order to be able to afford
settlements. -- The RIAA
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-soc/attachments/20090727/69d63dc9/attachment.pgp>


More information about the FFmpeg-soc mailing list