[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH/RFC] MP4A-LATM RTP depacketizer

Martin Storsjö martin
Thu Aug 5 10:46:12 CEST 2010

On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Luca Barbato wrote:

> On 08/05/2010 08:44 AM, Martin Storsj? wrote:
> > So, I guess the question still is, do we want to try to wrestle the 
> > demuxer into working with the RTP depacketizer, or just go for the 
> > standalone depacketizer (patch in the previous mail)? The RFC explicitly 
> > says that one shouldn't send multiple programs or multiple layers in RTP 
> > MP4A-LATM, so the expected stream format is quite simple.
> I'd go the way of the stand-alone packetizer.
> container in container for rtp is a perversion and in this specific case
> the stand alone method seems compact enough to be even safer.

Yes, that's my opinion too. Especially in the case where the RFC says that 
many of the more complicated LATM features aren't allowed.

// Martin

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list