[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH/RFC] MP4A-LATM RTP depacketizer
Thu Aug 5 10:22:34 CEST 2010
On 08/05/2010 08:44 AM, Martin Storsj? wrote:
> So, I guess the question still is, do we want to try to wrestle the
> demuxer into working with the RTP depacketizer, or just go for the
> standalone depacketizer (patch in the previous mail)? The RFC explicitly
> says that one shouldn't send multiple programs or multiple layers in RTP
> MP4A-LATM, so the expected stream format is quite simple.
I'd go the way of the stand-alone packetizer.
container in container for rtp is a perversion and in this specific case
the stand alone method seems compact enough to be even safer.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel