[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH/RFC] MP4A-LATM RTP depacketizer

[Martin Storsjö]

On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Martin Storsj? wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Luca Barbato wrote:
> 
> > On 08/05/2010 08:44 AM, Martin Storsj? wrote:
> > > So, I guess the question still is, do we want to try to wrestle the 
> > > demuxer into working with the RTP depacketizer, or just go for the 
> > > standalone depacketizer (patch in the previous mail)? The RFC explicitly 
> > > says that one shouldn't send multiple programs or multiple layers in RTP 
> > > MP4A-LATM, so the expected stream format is quite simple.
> > 
> > I'd go the way of the stand-alone packetizer.
> > 
> > container in container for rtp is a perversion and in this specific case
> > the stand alone method seems compact enough to be even safer.
> 
> Yes, that's my opinion too. Especially in the case where the RFC says that 
> many of the more complicated LATM features aren't allowed.

Applied after reaching some sort of consensus on irc.

// Martin