[MPlayer-dev-eng] [RFC] prefix for multiple inclusion guards

[Diego Biurrun]

On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:22:00PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:14:07PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > So we have consistent multiple inclusion guards now, but some of them
> > > are a little bit generic (MMX_H and PNM_H come to mind).  I propose
> > > giving all of them an MPlayer_ prefix to solve any namespace issues that
> > > might arise.  I'll do the work.  Objections?
> > 
> > I really don't like mixed case in #defines. What about just MP_ ?
> 
> Ummm, that was just a typo, I agree with you.  I meant MPLAYER_.

And what do we do about parts that are considered separate from MPlayer
like VIDIX and maybe loader/?  Should they get their own prefix like
LIBASS_?  In vidix/ some files have a VIDIX_ prefix, most don't...

Diego