[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] 5 year plan & Inovation

[Rémi Denis-Courmont]

Le 3 mai 2024 15:58:50 GMT+03:00, "Ondřej Fiala" <ofiala at airmail.cc> a écrit :
>On Fri May 3, 2024 at 7:46 AM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>> Le 2 mai 2024 22:32:16 GMT+03:00, "Ondřej Fiala" <ofiala at airmail.cc> a écrit :
>> >On Thu May 2, 2024 at 4:38 PM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>> >> Le torstaina 2. toukokuuta 2024, 17.25.06 EEST Ondřej Fiala a écrit :
>> >> > On Wed May 1, 2024 at 7:27 AM CEST, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>> >> > > I don't use Gmail, and using email for review still sucks. No matter how
>> >> > > you slice it, email was not meant for threaded code reviews.
>> >> > 
>> >> > Email was not meant for a lot of what it's used for today.
>> >>
>> >> And Gitlab and Github are meant for what they are used.
>> >> That's the whole point.
>> >This argument can actually go in both directions
>>
>> No, it can't.
>I wish your replies were more constructive

Then don't make ridiculously extreme arguments.

>> > Since the Web and web
>> >browsers weren't meant for performing code review either.
>>
>> I was obviously and explicitly talking about Github and Gitlab web
>> applications, not the browsers. You're being ridiculous.
>A web application is just a bunch of JavaScript and/or Web Assembly
>running in a web browser that supports it.

By that logic, your mail client is just a bunch of C or C++ files compiled together, and your processor is just a bunch of VHDL synthesised into silicon. This is called a reduction to absurd fallacy.

I don't care how much you despise web development. That doesn't change the *fact* that Gitlab is designed to manage code reviews and merges and mail clients are *not*.