[rtmpdump] [PATCH] Add support for building with gnutls with nettle as backend

[Martin Storsjö]

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Howard Chu wrote:

> Martin Storsjö wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Howard Chu wrote:
>> 
>>> Since gcrypt is an utter disaster, and gnutls is using nettle as the 
>>> default
>>> backend now, we could just use nettle and drop gcrypt.
>> 
>> Yes, that's also totally ok with me.
>> 
>> As I wrote earlier, this is still missing some verification of the swfhash
>> codepaths, I think I've got the rest of it tested already. Once someone
>> with access to test urls that actually require the swfhash stuff has
>> verified it, please go ahead.
>
> Perhaps we just need to write a separate test wrapper instead; running the 
> SWFhash is just a matter of hashing a known input and making sure it matches 
> a known output. As long as the underlying SHA functions are correct, this 
> should be easy to verify.

Right - verified that the nettle patch produces hashes identical to what 
the openssl codepath does.

So I think this patch is ok to proceed now, either as is, or by removing 
the gcrypt support at the same time.

// Martin