[MPlayer-users] How can I force mplayer to drop frames more consistently?

[belcampo]

Oliver Seitz wrote:
>> Dark Shadow wrote:
>>>> Off-Topic, if one doesn't need slow-motion and the human-eye needs .05
>>>> seconds to view a picture, what is the benefit of those very high(er)
>>>> framerates ?
>>> I am not sure I just thought if I was going to spend a lot of money on
>>> a camcorder I should get a good one. Plus I thought it may help
>>> considering I will be recording races and other high speed things with
>>> it.
>> You know how marketing-guys think, we customers think ?
>> More is better, expensive will be better.
>> The smaller digital cameras got worse when resolution got above
>> 8mega-pixels, because the physical distance of the pixels caused
>> interference and for that reason resulted in noticable more noise, which
>> was compensated for with software-noise reduction, resulting in less
>> picture quality. Reading/Studying Camera test-results may be a good
>> thing to invest in some time.
> 
> There have been improvements that lead to worsening things, but a frame
> rate of 25fps is not a constant that gives the best impression. It's a
> number that has been set a long time ago as a compromise between human
> vision, technical possibilities and cost efficiency. Pushing megapixels to
> the max is a bad idea while keeping the sensor size the same, I agree.
> 
> 1920x1080 is about 2 megapixels, that's not to much. But 50-60fps is a
> number that definitely improves movement reception. 
Is there any proof of this an where can this proof be found, I'm very 
interested.
> So I don't agree that
> such a frame rate is just sold as a pseudo-benefit to rise the price.
> 
> Greets,
> Kiste
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MPlayer-users mailing list
> MPlayer-users at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users