[MPlayer-users] Cropping in original-size vs reduced-size
Nico Sabbi
nsabbi at email.it
Fri Mar 23 17:52:57 CET 2007
Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>On Friday 23 March 2007 8:09 am, Nico Sabbi wrote:
>
>
>>why don't you crop before rescaling?
>>
>>
>
>I do. I was just talking hypothetically just to show my point.
>
>
>
>>something like
>>crop=704:480:8:0,scale=608:-10,expand=640:480
>>
>>
>
>Why would I crop black bands in order to have them back (using the expand
>option)?
>
>
>
don't expand then
>The problem I'm having is:
>
>1- If I crop based on original frame size and I my target resolution is
>640:480, the actual footage will not be 4:3. Let me make this clear:
>
>It's not the same to crop and scale than to scale and crop. I know the first
>one is the way to go but I just don't know how to end up with the proper size
>if I downscale to 640x480 for example.
>
>2- (hypothetically speaking). If I scale to 640:480 I'm actually getting 4:3
>(and the image looks as it should AR-wise) but then I have black bands on
>sides that I want to get rid of.
>
>Basically, I want to downscale but I'm not sure if for proper downscaling you
>should consider the original frame size (720x480 with black bands on sides)
>or if you need to just consider the actual contentent (cropped). I tend to
>think is the first one..since that's the way the signal is sent ot the TV
>when I play the DVD on my TV.
>
>
-vf crop=704:480:8:0,scale=640:-10
scales to y' (closest x16) keeping A/R, even after having cropped
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Videocorso di marketing: impara dagli esperti del settore come fare
* un marketing di successo per la tua attivita'
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?midb00&d#-3
More information about the MPlayer-users
mailing list