sriramans13 at yahoo.com
Sat Aug 20 21:08:06 CEST 2005
even before saying a "word" i want to thank you
for such a solution "bmovl2" !!
It is great to here frm the source...
As i asked is there any ulternative...or video card
support that we can use to overlay things on the
once again thanks for vf_osd
--- Jason Tackaberry <tack at sault.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 23:24 -0700, sri raman wrote:
> > -) Any one worked with this patch.....
> I wrote it. :)
> > -) Do you know any alternatives to bmovl2 , which
> > allow overlay thing over a playing video.....
> vf_osd, which has recently been submitted to
> mplayer-dev list. I
> received some feedback and need to make some changes
> > -) Any one intrested in this topic???
> I am. :)
> > ?) the bmovl patch (frm MeBox) is for 2005-Apr-1
> > mplayer build....In my new machine i have got
> > code installed....and it is shoing errors while
> > compiling 2005-Apr-1 mplayer build. any one
> > such an issue ??
> I haven't tested vf_bmovl2 in a fair while. It's
> deprecated in favor of
> vf_osd, so I no longer maintain it. You should
> probably port your
> application to vf_osd, which you can check out here:
> When I find the time, I plan to release a new patch
> to incorporate the
> suggestions I recently received.
> The main difference between vf_bmovl2 and vf_osd is
> that a fair bit of
> logic has been removed from vf_bmovl2. vf_osd is
> conceptually simpler,
> providing a single BGRA shmem buffer that your
> application can write to.
> Then your app issues a slave command to instruct
> mplayer to update that
> region of the OSD.
> > _______________________________________________
> MPlayer-users mailing list
> MPlayer-users at mplayerhq.hu
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
More information about the MPlayer-users