tack at sault.org
Sat Aug 20 16:10:00 CEST 2005
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 23:24 -0700, sri raman wrote:
> -) Any one worked with this patch.....
I wrote it. :)
> -) Do you know any alternatives to bmovl2 , which will
> allow overlay thing over a playing video.....
vf_osd, which has recently been submitted to mplayer-dev list. I
received some feedback and need to make some changes before
> -) Any one intrested in this topic???
I am. :)
> ?) the bmovl patch (frm MeBox) is for 2005-Apr-1
> mplayer build....In my new machine i have got fedora
> code installed....and it is shoing errors while
> compiling 2005-Apr-1 mplayer build. any one faced
> such an issue ??
I haven't tested vf_bmovl2 in a fair while. It's deprecated in favor of
vf_osd, so I no longer maintain it. You should probably port your
application to vf_osd, which you can check out here:
When I find the time, I plan to release a new patch to incorporate the
suggestions I recently received.
The main difference between vf_bmovl2 and vf_osd is that a fair bit of
logic has been removed from vf_bmovl2. vf_osd is conceptually simpler,
providing a single BGRA shmem buffer that your application can write to.
Then your app issues a slave command to instruct mplayer to update that
region of the OSD.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the MPlayer-users