[MPlayer-users] Re: units: KB, KiB, KBit/s, MB, MiB, MBit/s, ...
jonner at teegra.net
Thu Aug 28 05:41:47 CEST 2003
Ryan Voots wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 08:22, Jonathan Rogers wrote:
>>zimon at iki.fi wrote:
>>>Pop quiz: One minute of raw video at 800 Kbit/s will take X amount of memory
>>>when stored in raw format? X is...
>>>a) 6.00 MB
>>>b) 6.00 MiB
>>>c) 5.72 MB
>>>d) 5.72 MiB
>>I think the answer is either "a" or "d". What do I win if I'm right? :)
> stupid marking people who changed it from 1024 to 1000, i always hated
> that, because everyone gets so confused when i use the correct (when
> dealing with fs's) 1024
> sorry just me ranting about nothing...
The prize is "stupid marking people?" ;) I certainly agree that the
confusion between the conflicting definitions of the prefixes has been
exploited for marketing purposes, which is reprehensible. However, it
wasn't marketing people that changed 1024 to 1000. The metric/SI
prefixes (kilo, mega, etc.) have been powers of ten for hundreds of years.
At some point in the last fifty years, somebody carelessly started using
the same prefixes for powers of two. I'm sure the confusion we have
today wasn't forseen or intended, but the new prefixes are an attempt to
correct that blunder. If everyone starts using the new prefixes for
their intended purpose, the SI prefixes can revert to their original
meanings. I use the IEC prefixes because they promote more uniform usage
and precision of terms, not because I'm proselytizing for the IEC or
More information about the MPlayer-users