[MPlayer-G2-dev] reducing/simplifying codebase
gabucino at mplayerhq.hu
gabucino at mplayerhq.hu
Tue Jul 22 09:21:35 CEST 2003
D Richard Felker III wrote:
> Agree mostly, but a bit undecided... It sucks for users to have to
> install special libs to compile a working mplayer, especially when
> those libs are considered "risky" by distro maintainers, and thus not
> included in distros.
So they are gonna drop it out of MPlayer too :)
BTW Joe User usually installs libdvd* stuff anyways, just in case.. So we
might actually drop mpdvdkit.
> > - libmpeg2 - it's quite broken, at least it cannot handle seeking at all
> > and is already patched to hell to work at all work mplayer...
> And slower than libavcodec, it seems...
libmpeg2:
BENCHMARKs: VC: 0.825s VO: 1.394s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.329s = 2.548s
ffmpeg12:
BENCHMARKs: VC: 0.999s VO: 1.300s A: 0.000s Sys: 0.378s = 2.677s
libmpeg2 seems to be 5% faster (x86), can be considered marginal, for sake
of simplicity and workability.
> > Also when we port things from g1, we should consider
> > - dropping .raw font support, imho freetype alone is enough.
> Agree totally.
Hold the horses ;) While personally I haven't used RAW fonts for about a year,
the libttf-dependancy I think is a very good reason to keep RAW fonts. And on
top of all the shit, only recent libttf works together with MPlayer...
--
Gabucino
MPlayer Core Team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-g2-dev/attachments/20030722/15b28dc7/attachment.pgp>
More information about the MPlayer-G2-dev
mailing list