[MPlayer-G2-dev] Re: VP layer progress [update!]
D Richard Felker III
dalias at aerifal.cx
Tue Dec 23 16:54:14 CET 2003
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:35:12PM +0200, Andriy N. Gritsenko wrote:
> Hi, D Richard Felker III!
> Sometime (on Tuesday, December 23 at 12:09) I've received something...
> >I've made a lot more progress on the vp layer. There are still some
> >key things left to be done, but I'm posting my TODO list here and
> >reminding you of the source-browse url:
> > http://brightrain.aerifal.cx/~dalias/vp-in-progress/
> >If anyone has objections to it (even silly stuff like bad names for
> >the functions or struct members) please post and we can discuss.
> Are you sure vp_node_t must have vp_link_t** pointers? As I may see
> some filter may want it as NULL-terminated list, some as counted list
> (but there is no counter in the structure so filter will have it in
> vp_priv_s), some may want to sort list in own order so have some own
> structure for that. So I think you have to remove these xin and xout
> pointers from vp_node_t structure since it may be just a waste. If any
> filter may have more than one input or output link then that filter may
> always have these pointers in vp_priv_s structure. :)
Impossible. If the pointers are hidden, vp_pull_frame can't walk the
chain! Originally when I was planning for recursive calling, I
intended to do something like this, but now I think there has to be
some unified structure or else the vp layer and the program that set
up the pipeline can lose track of what's in it!
More information about the MPlayer-G2-dev