[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH 1/3] Fix build with libdvdnav due to missing files
Diego Biurrun
diego at biurrun.de
Thu Jul 25 18:34:01 CEST 2013
On 2013-07-25 18:20, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Thursday, 18 July 2013 at 13:37, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> On 2013-07-18 11:03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 16 July 2013 at 17:19, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>>> On 2013-07-16 11:34, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, 16 July 2013 at 10:43, Jiang Jiang wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes, libdvdnav is an external, but I checked the svn repo provided on the
>>>>>>> official website, dvdnav.mplayerhq.hu,
>>>>>>> and one git repo on GitHub, I cannot find the files which are added to
>>>>>>> Makefile in your patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please recheck your local revision.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right, I was using the videolan fork:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dvdnav.general/1756
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the official respository still maintained?
>>>>>
>>>>> It is on life support. I thought I could handle at least being a patch
>>>>> monkey and release manager, but it seems I don't have time even for that.
>>>>> Help is welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me use this space to call out for maintainers. SVN commit access
>>>>> was offered and the offer is still open, just ask Reimar.
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you help the VideoLAN people instead of keeping libdvdnav
>>>> in a zombie state?
>>>
>>> Help how? I don't remember being asked about anything.
>>
>> j-b sent an email to dvdnav-discuss.
>
> Announcing his fork, yes. I read all his e-mails from the past two years
> and he never requested commit access. Not once.
Yes, so? There is no law against forking. libdvdnav is already
progressing faster than it did in the past few years under the VideoLAN
umbrella. Why are you (seemingly) hell-bent on sulking and wasting time
on the zombie side of libdvdnav?
Diego
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list