[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] replacement for internal mpg123 fork (mp3lib), what is performance?

Reimar Döffinger Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de
Sun May 30 12:07:56 CEST 2010


On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:31:20AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:08:50AM +0200, Thomas Orgis wrote:
> > Am Sun, 30 May 2010 10:30:21 +0200
> > schrieb Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de>: 
> > 
> > > Please consistently use K&R style: space between keyword and (,
> > > { on the same line as the keyword.
> > 
> > > *sh, more below
> > 
> > > There are some long lines that you could easily break.
> > 
> > Thanks for your remarks, but as I see strong debate on technical
> > aspects, I humbly ask for some tolerance on the style... this patch
> > version is the experiment to cram all possible ways of input into the
> > source, with the preprocessor flags as quick switches... it's hacky, I
> > know. Once the weird performance issues are settled, I intend to strip
> > the patch again, to leave the code that remains.
> 
> See my other mail, I was trying to explore the possibility of merging
> this in some form already and then working out the details.
> 
> In any case style nits should not take you more than a minute to fix.
> For the next round of patches you can keep it in mind and save even
> more time :)

I would prefer a smaller version (without bitrate calculation and other
stuff I am not really convinced they actually have a purpose) for a
first commit, but honestly it may be better to just commit (but make sure it
is not used by default or something) and work from there.
There's simply too many different things being discussed here in that thread,
I have a hard time just finding the latest patch.



More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list