[MPlayer-dev-eng] [RFC] prefix for multiple inclusion guards

[Diego Biurrun]

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:13:34AM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:24:37AM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:22:20AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:57:42AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > > And what do we do about parts that are considered separate from MPlayer
> > > > like VIDIX and maybe loader/?  Should they get their own prefix like
> > > > LIBASS_?  In vidix/ some files have a VIDIX_ prefix, most don't...
> > > 
> > > Committed without vidix/ and loader/ for now.  What about them?  If
> > > nobody speaks up I will give them a MPLAYER_ prefix as well.
> > 
> > Aren't we supposed to keep vidix in sync with sourceforge??
> 
> I'm pretty sure vidix was heavily forked to make it work as a normal
> static library in MPlayer and not all the usual dynamic-load crap..

None of your personal pet reasons apply.  It's strictly a problem of an
unresponsive/difficult upstream.

Diego