[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] -noconfig option

Alban Bedel albeu at free.fr
Tue Apr 15 22:22:58 CEST 2008


On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:40:56 +0400
Andrew Savchenko <Bircoph at list.ru> wrote:

> > and the noconfig_all function can be made static.
> 
> Well, I do not object against this. But what is the reason to make 
> it static? It has no arguments neither variable declarations, thus 
> I can see no benefits nor disadvantages of making it static.

I don't see what you mean, perhaps you are confusing things with static
methods in c++. A static function is just local to the compilation
unit, so other compilation unit can't use it directly. It's generally a
good habit to make any function which is not "public" static.

	Albeu




More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list