[MPlayer-dev-eng] The path to RC2

Attila Kinali attila at kinali.ch
Sat Nov 4 08:36:15 CET 2006


On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:20:21 +0100
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik at rangers.eu.org> wrote:

> On Thursday, 02 November 2006 at 21:53, Roberto Togni wrote:
> > Imo the main "problem" is not 1.0 itself, but what is coming after
> > it. Are we going to maintain it? How? How long? Who's going to do it? As
> > soon as trunk starts diverging from 1.0, backporting fixes will get
> > time consuming.
> 
> No, we're not.

Definitly not. Maintaining two trees is more than
we can handle with our limited manpower.

 
> > And we also should keep some big feature for post-1.0, to make users
> > (and hopefully distributions too) go back to svn version.
> 
> I think we've already agreed that we won't treat 1.0 as some big milestone,
> it's just another release, just like preX and rcX, even if their naming was
> inconsistent with their purpose.

We will not, but people will. Just have a look at our
traffic stats. We have not two weeks straight 20% more
traffic since the release of rc1. With preX releases it
settled after 3-5 days.

				Attila Kinali

-- 
Lotus Notes ist eine verteilte Datenbankapplikation,
als Sample ist eine miese Groupware dabei ;)
                       -- Lukas Beeler



More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list