[MPlayer-dev-eng] Make libavutil mandatory

[Diego Biurrun]

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:06:49PM +0200, Ivo wrote:
> On Friday 07 July 2006 21:44, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> > 2006/7/6, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de>:
> > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:56:52PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > > Making libavutil mandatory has been coming up a lot recently and
> > > > especially Reimar keeps lobbying for it.  Here is a patch that
> > > > implements it.  Is anyone against requiring libavutil?
> >
> > --- configure	(revision 18927)
> > +++ configure	(working copy)
> > @@ -6139,6 +5825,10 @@
> >      _res_comment="using libavutil.so, but static libavutil is
> > recommended" fi
> >  fi
> > +# libavutil is mandatory ...
> > +if test "$_libavutil_so" = no ; then
> >
> > Why only *_so. Are we not going to accept static build-in libavutil?
> > I'm even more woried by the line before this code block
> >
> > if test "$_libavutil" != yes ; then
> 
> It only checks for libavutil.so if there is no static version, so if test 
> "$_libavutil_so" = no it means there is no static and no shared version, in 
> which case the message is printed and configure is exited.
> 
> At least, that's how I understood the patch.

Correct.

I've heard no objections in a week.  Patch committed.

Diego