[MPlayer-dev-eng] Make libavutil mandatory

[Ivo]

On Friday 07 July 2006 21:44, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> 2006/7/6, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de>:
> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:56:52PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > Making libavutil mandatory has been coming up a lot recently and
> > > especially Reimar keeps lobbying for it.  Here is a patch that
> > > implements it.  Is anyone against requiring libavutil?
>
> Index: configure
> ===================================================================
> --- configure	(revision 18927)
> +++ configure	(working copy)
> @@ -6139,6 +5825,10 @@
>      _res_comment="using libavutil.so, but static libavutil is
> recommended" fi
>  fi
> +# libavutil is mandatory ...
> +if test "$_libavutil_so" = no ; then
>
> Why only *_so. Are we not going to accept static build-in libavutil?
> I'm even more woried by the line before this code block
>
> if test "$_libavutil" != yes ; then

It only checks for libavutil.so if there is no static version, so if test 
"$_libavutil_so" = no it means there is no static and no shared version, in 
which case the message is printed and configure is exited.

At least, that's how I understood the patch.

--Ivo