[MPlayer-dev-eng] Mplayer & directfb
Curtis Magyar
cumagyar at mts.net
Tue May 18 18:06:42 CEST 2004
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 16:34 +0200, Jiri Svoboda wrote:
> Simple test to determinne what is broken is to run exaple programs coming
> with directfb (try them run also on overlay). If they fail it's propably
> directfb fault otherwise the problem is on mplayer side.
I have done this already, I can't find any program that fails like this
other than MPlayer. They all appear fine. Also, I just realized that
the problem also occurs with the fbdev vo, but strangely (to me anyway)
not the fbdev2 vo. I always thought this was a problem only with the
directfb vo. Perhaps I never tried fbdev under 2.6 before.
> Also test if -(no)dr switch has any effect. If Yes there is a problem in
> vo directfb. In this case send me a full log please and I'll try to figure
> out whats wrong...
> From the first look at images it looks like pixelformat/stride
> problem.
I did not see any difference from -dr or -nodr. I'll attach a logfile
for directfb under 2.6. I can't find any difference between the logs
from fbdev under 2.4 and 2.6 (even though one works, and one doesn't),
but when I diff the directfb logs though, I see one interesting
difference:
In 2.4, I see:
DirectFB: Format query: BGR 24-bit
DirectFB: Test format - layer 0 scale/pos 0
DirectFB: Test format - added layer 0 scale/pos 0
VO: [directfb] 720x480 => 720x540 BGR 24-bit [fs] [vm]
And in 2.6, I see:
DirectFB: Format query: BGR 32-bit
DirectFB: Test format - layer 0 scale/pos 0
DirectFB: Test format - added layer 0 scale/pos 0
VO: [directfb] 720x480 => 720x540 BGR 32-bit [fs] [vm]
Maybe this is a difference in the capability of the fb drivers?
Thanks very much for the reply.
--
Curtis
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list