[MPlayer-dev-eng] Patch: Low latency audio enhancements
Ed Wildgoose
lists at wildgooses.com
Sat Aug 21 13:00:39 CEST 2004
>less invasive, does that mean that theres still some side effects and if
>so which(sorry im not too familiar with the ao internals)?
>
>
Not at all. It was just before I lobbied to change the ao internals to
raise the latency a bit, ie increase the default buffer size. There was
some resistance to that.
However, at least with my 2.6 kernel I seem to be able to easily
maintain latencies of 2 x 512 samples, while compiling stuff and
watching a film, so I'm quite happy to leave the code the way it is
now. In fact for me it might even be a slight advantage because my card
doesn't report free space correctly, only whether a buffer is empty or
full, so the 512/1024 buffer sizes will track the audio and video more
accurately.
I think the patch as submitted will basically fix a few minor problems
for people who have low latency cards (they probably saw some wierd
effects when fast forwarding), and reduces the latency of the main loop
for people like me with audio cards with small buffer sizes. It also
fixes a minor bug in ao code.
I don't expect to see any negative impact from these changes. However,
I can at last finally use mplayer! (Now I think I need to make the same
changes to Xine and Ogle since they are broken for me as well)
Please apply to CVS
Thanks
Ed W
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list