[MPlayer-cygwin] Preliminary Cygwin compilation guide
Diego Biurrun
diego at biurrun.de
Mon Jul 12 12:51:02 CEST 2004
Stefan Gürtler writes:
>
> > Stefan Gürtler writes:
> > >
> > > This is the way e.g. Sascha Sommer is doing it for his win32 releases at
> > > mplayerhq.hu.
> >
> > These are MinGW packages.
> >
> > I strongly disagree about --codecsdir=codecs being a good thing on
> > Cygwin. If you want to take out the mplayer binary, this is already a
> > specialized need. This could of course be described as an option.
> >
> Isn't / wasn't there someone on the list that provided win32 packages based
> on cygwin, too? I remeber that he disabled the console window i his builds.
Joey Parrish
> I agree that standalones taken form MinGW should performe better and
> therefore are to be prefered to cygwin standalones.
I never said that.
> Though I have to say
> that at least I sometimes have issues with the MinGW port that dissappear in
> the cygwin ports (most probalby because of the SSE bugs in MinGWs always
> very latest gcc compilers. cygwins somewhat more conservative gcc builds
> work better on the mplyer/mencoder source.) And it was/is often much easier
> for inexperienced users ( that will look into guids like this) to compile
> extra libs like e.g. liblame, libogg/ libvorbis/libntheora etc. under cygwin
> than under MinGW, as they often have autoconf building mechanism / configure
> scripts / Makefiles that are already opimized to work under cygwin but not
> under MinGW, though it is getting better!
And this is the reason why I find Cygwin that much more comfortable
and prefer it over the MinGW port.
Diego
More information about the MPlayer-cygwin
mailing list