[MPlayer-cvslog] r25521 - trunk/libmpdemux/demux_ogg.c
Balatoni Denes
dbalatoni at interware.hu
Wed Jan 2 23:53:45 CET 2008
Hi!
Wednesday 02 January 2008 21:01-kor Diego Biurrun ezt írta:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 03:10:07PM +0100, Balatoni Denes wrote:
> > Thursday 27 December 2007 12:44-kor Diego Biurrun ezt írta:
>
> There is no doubt that contributing to MPlayer can be a slow and tedious
> process. However, I disagree that this is a question of attitude. It
> is a matter of manpower. We receive around an order of magnitude more
> patches than we have time to review.
You are perfectly right that manpower is an issue. But I am also critical of
the reviewing process, where each patch is picked apart to it's last letter.
I think it would be suffcient to point out blatant errors, and violations of
(preferably written) policy - but not force the contributor into compliance
in every minor (sometimes subjective) issue. It would be a form of generosity
towards the contributor if you wish, and without mentioning the obvious
advantages imho it also wouldn't lead to any visible or practical degradation
to the quality of the codebase (we are talking about the mplayer codebase
here afterall). I am sure that this point is controversial to many of you -
but this is the compromise and attitude I have mentioned before.
> So what do you call potential developer? More contributors we do not
> need, there are more than we can handle already. What we need are more
> reviewers, but these are extremely hard to come by. Very few committers
> review patches, much less outside their area of expertise.
More reviewers would of course be needed. However I don't think that a normal
open-source project would ever be wishing for less contributors. Better
contributions maybe, but definietly not less.
bye
Denes
More information about the MPlayer-cvslog
mailing list