[MPlayer-cvslog] CVS: main get_path.c,1.8,1.9

[Diego Biurrun]

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 02:31:57PM +0200, Guillaume Poirier wrote:
> 
> On 4/24/05, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 05:03:23PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > >
> > > Aside from stuff like this or mistakes caught within a few seconds of
> > > commit, I agree totally, we should abandon -o..
> > 
> > The command is called admin for a reason, not every user should should
> > employ it.  In the case you describe the CVS admin could remove that
> > revision (and revoke that person's CVS access).
> > 
> > What about the others?  Do we have a consensus to abandon 'cvs admin -o'?
> 
> I've used it last week as I had screwed a commit on the XML docs. CVS
> admin allowed me to redo it again properly, so that people who
> translate it afterwards have a chance to work from cleaner commits and
> not loose some of their precious time because of me.
> So I'd say let's not ban cvs admin when it saves everybody's time.

As always this is a tradeoff.  I don't think it is a big deal for the
translators to cope with two commits.  In this case the second commit
will come quickly after the first and translators will be translating
both at the same time anyway...

Diego