[MEncoder-users] Tuning hqdn3d
RC
cooleyr at gmail.com
Sun May 10 21:11:47 CEST 2009
On Sun, 10 May 2009 11:25:00 -0500
Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I've been playing with the settings, and I seem to get stuck
> with either a lot of noise, a lot of "trails",
The temporal values cause trails. Set those low.
> I even tried using both hqdn3d and nr, but nr gives a slight dark red
> hue even at values as low as 100.
Can't say I've _ever_ seen that, though I've never combined the two.
> I don't want to spend a great amount of time on an encode
Then use "turbo".
> quality is what I aim for rather than a target filesize, so crf wins
> over 2-pass by a large margin.
That doesn't make much sense. Figure out what the average bitrate is
when you encode the video with your CRF values, then use that as the
bitrate for a 2-pass encode, and you should get somewhat better quality,
at the same file size.
With the way x264 handles threading, I wouldn't be surprised if
2-pass+turbo mode was just as fast as CRF, on systems with several
cores.
--
Don't trust me! I'm wrong!
More information about the MEncoder-users
mailing list