[MEncoder-users] V210 Codec

[Larry Reznick]

Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 01:01:23PM -0800, Larry Reznick wrote:
>   
>> My point is that one must read these atoms to know how 
>> to interpret the MDAT atom. Consequently, the 1753, the 2997, and the 
>> 219125 for this clip are knowable quickly and they reduce to 2997:125 in 
>> 32 bits as I showed previously.
>>     
>
> Ok, so I decided to calculate it properly.
> 2997:125 converted to single precision float according to my
> calculations gives 23.975999951.
> And the fraction you got indeed is closer to that than 2997/125.
> Which explains that part quite nicely.
> No idea why the -fps option makes no difference.
> Anyway, I think this is fixed since a few hours so this is not really
> important anyway.
>   

Hmm. Strange that you should get that error. I tried galculator & 
gcalctool as well as the Qalculate! I mentioned before and none of them 
showed extra digits. Your calculator is giving you a bad time.

Thanks for your interest in this, Reimar.

--Larry