[MEncoder-users] divx v's x264

[belcampo]

Alex Samad wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:26:02AM +0200, belcampo wrote:
>> Alex Samad wrote:
>>> Hi
> 
> [snip]
> 
>>> Am i doing something silly ? I was under the impression that x264 was
>>> meant to give smaller files.
>> If you specify the SAME bitrates you'll get the SAME filesizes.
> 
> My presumption when making that statement was that I was using
> different codecs.  If I use different codecs then I would presume I
> would get different size's. 
> 
> So what you are saying is with a bitrate of 400kb/s I would get an okay
> x264 video but mpeg2 would be awful!
Yes
> 
> 
>> Henk Schoneveld
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MEncoder-users mailing list
>>> MEncoder-users at mplayerhq.hu
>>> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mencoder-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEncoder-users mailing list
>> MEncoder-users at mplayerhq.hu
>> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mencoder-users
>>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEncoder-users mailing list
> MEncoder-users at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mencoder-users