[MEncoder-users] divx v's x264

[Alex Samad]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:26:02AM +0200, belcampo wrote:
> Alex Samad wrote:
> > Hi

[snip]

> > 
> > Am i doing something silly ? I was under the impression that x264 was
> > meant to give smaller files.
> If you specify the SAME bitrates you'll get the SAME filesizes.

My presumption when making that statement was that I was using
different codecs.  If I use different codecs then I would presume I
would get different size's. 

So what you are saying is with a bitrate of 400kb/s I would get an okay
x264 video but mpeg2 would be awful!


> 
> Henk Schoneveld
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > MEncoder-users mailing list
> > MEncoder-users at mplayerhq.hu
> > https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mencoder-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEncoder-users mailing list
> MEncoder-users at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mencoder-users
> 

-- 
"I try to go for longer runs, but it's tough around here at the White House on the outdoor track. It's sad that I can't run longer. It's one of the saddest things about the presidency. "

	- George W. Bush
interview with Runners World, Aug. 2002
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mencoder-users/attachments/20080604/eab56b7d/attachment.pgp>