[MEncoder-users] Mencoder quality settings ...

[Moritz Barsnick]

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 16:01:32 -0800, Phil Ehrens wrote:

> The problem is that you unwittingly stepped into a nest of
> snakes by referring to "loss" as opposed to acceptable
> degradation. There are plenty of "lossy" formats that can
> be used to reencode to smaller size with acceptable
> degradation. As a matter of fact, a little tweaking will
> often result in a "lossy" encode that *looks* better than the
> original.

Thanks, that sums up the problem much more nicely. :)

Moritz