[MEncoder-users] Noise reduction and interlacing: (hq)denoise3d vs. nr

[Nico Sabbi]

Pierre Catello wrote:

>
>tfields doubles the framerate but tinterlace should halves it.
>I just checked  with a large spatial filter such that its effect would be
>obvious :
>$ mencoder "RFID.mpg" -nosound -endpos 30 -v
>f tfields=0,denoise3d=10:0:0:0,tinterlace -ovc lavc -lavcopts
>vcodec=mpeg4:ildct:ilme:vqscale=2 -o "RFID.avi"
>
>The result is as expected, and the framerate is right.
>  
>

here the height is doubled

>May be your "implementation" is the way to go and is faster, but I was
>simply trying to help the original poster and the point I was addressing was
>the effect of a spatial filter on interlaced content (in addition to a
>question regarding lavc internal denoising filter vs hqdn3d).
>My suggestion was may be a bad idea as you mentionned, I'm sorry and surely
>won't do that again...
>  
>
why not? having alternatives is always a good idea.
There's no need to be sorry