[FFmpeg-user] libx265 a lot slower

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Mon Aug 17 14:18:49 EEST 2020

Am 17.08.20 um 10:53 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user:
> Your assumption that everyone is an expert is unreasonable.

you don't need to be an expert for common sense, thast's why it's called
that way neiter am i an expert for video codecs

it's simply logical that smaller files with the same or better quality
need more computing power and examples where it's possible are very rae
in the history

> Am 17.08.20 um 02:07 schrieb Mark Filipak:
>> On 08/16/2020 05:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 16.08.20 um 19:14 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
>>>> Reindl is known for acerbic and unhelpful answers, AFAICT most readers
>>>> ignore them.
>>> there is nothing acerbic or unhelpful point to common sense that a new
>>> codec with better quality or smaller files (and if both is ecpected)
>>> comes with a logical cost
>> That is illogical. There is no reason why one should expect that libx265
>> will take longer to encode. If you have information to the contrary, you
>> could cite it instead of being insulting.
> i can't teach you common sense

More information about the ffmpeg-user mailing list