[FFmpeg-user] libx265 a lot slower

Phil Rhodes phil_rhodes at rocketmail.com
Mon Aug 17 11:53:22 EEST 2020

 For christ's sake.
People, be polite. Harald, you are incredibly impolite. This is a user list. It is reasonable for people to ask basic questions here. Your assumption that everyone is an expert is unreasonable.
    On Monday, 17 August 2020, 07:24:33 BST, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:  

Am 17.08.20 um 02:07 schrieb Mark Filipak:
> On 08/16/2020 05:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 16.08.20 um 19:14 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
>>> Reindl is known for acerbic and unhelpful answers, AFAICT most readers
>>> ignore them.
>> there is nothing acerbic or unhelpful point to common sense that a new
>> codec with better quality or smaller files (and if both is ecpected)
>> comes with a logical cost
> That is illogical. There is no reason why one should expect that libx265
> will take longer to encode. If you have information to the contrary, you
> could cite it instead of being insulting.

i can't teach you common sense
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".  

More information about the ffmpeg-user mailing list