[FFmpeg-user] ffvhuff codec improvement

[Peter B.]

On 10/01/2013 11:39 PM, mike wrote:
>
>> What's wrong with ffv1?
>> (Which produces significantly smaller files iirc.)
>
> For me ffv1 is usable only if i need record in 444p, but it is not
> usable for any editing purpose, cause it not operate on single frame
> (seeking taking too long),

Interesting.
May I ask which application, which container (avi, mov, mkv, ...) and
which version of ffv1 (1 or 3) you are using?

I'm asking, because we're using FFV1 for editing (over the network even)
on a daily basis and it works super smooth. I do have noticed however,
that the speed of seeking varies greatly from application to application.


Regards,
Pb