[FFmpeg-user] ffvhuff codec improvement

[Carl Eugen Hoyos]

mike <chronek <at> interia.eu> writes:

> > What's wrong with ffv1?
> > (Which produces significantly smaller files iirc.)
> 
> For me ffv1 is usable only if i need record in 444p, 
> but it is not usable for any editing purpose, cause 
> it not operate on single frame (seeking taking too 
> long),

I may misunderstand but you can use ffv1 intra-only 
(and for some input files, its output will still be 
several orders of magnitude smaller than huffyuv).

In any case: Please report your problems with ffv1 
in a way that allows developers to reproduce them, 
fixes for ffv1 are significantly more likely than 
new features for huffyuv (except maybe multi- 
threading).

Carl Eugen