[FFmpeg-soc] [soc]: r1341 - in eac3: eac3.h eac3dec.c
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni at gmx.at
Thu Sep 13 12:05:01 CEST 2007
Hi
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:44:32AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:25:16PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> > Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 09:53:51AM +0200, bwolowiec wrote:
> > >> @@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ static int parse_audblk(GetBitContext *g
> > >> - for(ch=!s->cplinu[blk]; ch<=s->ntchans; ch++){
> > >> + for(ch=!s->cplinu[blk]; ch<=s->num_channels; ch++){
> > >> if(s->chexpstr[blk][ch]!=EXP_REUSE){
> > >
> > > Note that "for (" and "if (" is preferred.
> >
> > For as long as I've been a part of FFmpeg, there has never been any
> > focus on small stylistic differences such as these, only on consistency.
> > I personally don't use spaces between my for's/if's/while's and the
> > parentheses. Nobody has ever called me out for it or suggested I change
> > my coding style.
>
> Consistency is more important, true. Nevertheless, if you look at some
> of Michael's recent reviews, you will notice that the spaced forms are
> indeed preferred.
>
> Also, this code was mixing both forms.
i never complained about the lack of space, only about it being inconsistent
personally i normally write
for(i=0; i<X; i++){
}
grep 'for(i=' snow.c |wc
54 170 1747
grep 'for *( *i *=' snow.c | grep -v 'for(i='|wc
5 44 195
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
it is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make
their appearance in the world. -- Aristotle
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-soc/attachments/20070913/b5c3fbcc/attachment.pgp>
More information about the FFmpeg-soc
mailing list