[FFmpeg-devel] Request For Comment no Matroska specs

[Steve Lhomme]

On 2022-04-01 14:33, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> Hi ffmmpeg developers,
> 
> As you may know, we are working hard on the Matroska specifications at 
> the IETF. We already got EBML as an RFC [1]. We are in the process of 
> finalizing the main Matroska document. Before we submit the document for 
> formal review before "final" publishing, we would like people who know a 
> bit about Matroska to review the current draft in case there are parts 
> missing, hard to decipher or, even worse, bugs.
> 
> This is a 200 pages document, so it may take a while. You can find draft 
> 09 at [2]. It should explain what is found in Matroska 1 to 4. Some 
> unused elements have been deprecated since the original informal 
> specifications. These elements can be found in Annex A.

I forgot to mention you can reply here or on the GitHub repository of 
the specs [3] by creating an issue or even a Pull Request.

[3] https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/matroska-specification

> Thanks
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8794/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska/
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".