[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] avformat/sbgdec: Check opt_duration and start for overflow
James Almer
jamrial at gmail.com
Fri Jun 25 23:32:25 EEST 2021
On 6/25/2021 12:58 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 09:22:03AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 6/24/2021 5:57 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> Fixes: signed integer overflow: 2788626175500000000 + 7118941284000000000 cannot be represented in type 'long'
>>> Fixes: 35215/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_dem_SBG_fuzzer-6123272247836672
>>>
>>> Found-by: continuous fuzzing process https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
>>> ---
>>> libavformat/sbgdec.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/libavformat/sbgdec.c b/libavformat/sbgdec.c
>>> index dafdc4a1cc..0a6e927e57 100644
>>> --- a/libavformat/sbgdec.c
>>> +++ b/libavformat/sbgdec.c
>>> @@ -935,6 +935,9 @@ static int expand_timestamps(void *log, struct sbg_script *s)
>>> }
>>> if (s->start_ts == AV_NOPTS_VALUE)
>>> s->start_ts = (s->opt_start_at_first && s->tseq) ? s->tseq[0].ts.t : now;
>>> + if (av_sat_add64(s->start_ts, s->opt_duration) != s->start_ts + (uint64_t)s->opt_duration)
>>
>> Can't this instead be an if (s->start_ts > INT64_MAX - s->opt_duration)
>> check? Both s->start_ts and s->opt_duration are apparently guaranteed to be
>> positive.
>
> The variables are read by str_to_time() which looks like it can read negative
> numbers.
Afaics, it checks the very first character to be < '0' || > '9' for both
hours and minutes, so strtol() is not going to see a '-'.
Is there supposed to be one for seconds in valid files? If not, the same
check could be done and ensure no negative value is parsed.
> But maybe iam missing something
>
> thx
>
> [...]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list