[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Suggestion for a Nicer Integration with GitHub

Soft Works softworkz at hotmail.com
Sat Aug 14 04:30:27 EEST 2021



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Lynne
> Sent: Saturday, 14 August 2021 03:08
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Suggestion for a Nicer Integration with
> GitHub
> 

> The situation is far from perfect. In my opinion, mirroring will just
> result in such an incredible amount of noise on the ML, the ML
> will turn useless anyway, and due to needing to maintain both,
> one will fall out of favour with developers and will break, while
> limiting the integration for the other.

I'm don't think it would create much noise, please see my reply to
Michael from 1.5h ago.

There's no need to maintain both, because what happens on GitHub is 
automated and the ML remains the core instrument.

Should it turn out over time that activity would converge away
from the ML, then this would be a natural and democratic evolvement.
Then, it would be time to reconsider the organization, obviously.

> I'd rather move to either a self-hosted Gitea or Gogs instance,
> or failing that, Github. IMO Gitea is pretty good and fast. As bad
> as that could be, it'll be better than what we have now or could have
> with Gitlab.

These kinds of proposals have been talked down too often, that's 
why I'm suggesting something with a more realistic chance for acceptance
and that won't hurt or affect anybody in his work if he doesn't want.

Also, the stakes are much lower than with a full migration.
If it wouldn't work out well, it can be abandoned easily, while a 
migration is usually a way of no return.


softworkz 




More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list