[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] news: add thank you note for telepoint/mediahub

Ganesh Ajjanagadde gajjanag at mit.edu
Wed Oct 14 01:38:50 CEST 2015


On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:37 AM, compn <tempn at mi.rr.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:18:35 -0400
> Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanag at mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:13 AM, compn <tempn at mi.rr.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:10:22 -0700
>> > "Reynaldo H. Verdejo Pinochet" <reynaldo at osg.samsung.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Signed-off-by: Reynaldo H. Verdejo Pinochet
>> >> <reynaldo at osg.samsung.com> ---
>> >>  src/index | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > applied.
>>
>> Was the grammar change I pointed out incorporated? What about the
>> second suggestion?
>
> you can check on ffmpeg.org (it updated as soon as i committed).

got it; did not know about the automatic updates.

>
> "on their own" -> "in their own" was fixed. thank you.
>
> "for their support" -> "for your support" was not.
>
> just my personal choice, as now the sentence kind of reads as a general
> "everyone should thank telepoint/mediahub for this donation" instead of
> a "we thank telepoint/mediahub for this donation". more of a community
> thank you? i dunno. maybe it should be "thanks TO telepoint and ..."
> instead.

No problem - not worth spending more energy on this IMHO.

>
> if i was going to fix something else i'd probably change this as well:
> "donated a dedicated server with free of charge internet connectivity."
> to "donated a dedicated server and bandwidth."

Apart from the slight verbosity, don't see an issue with the current wording.

>
> i am a native english speaker , but years of helping non-native english
> speakers has warped my comprehension. so now if i think the sentence
> conveys the required information, i will just leave it alone. :)
>
> otherwise hours and hours get spent on spelling and grammar and it
> drains motivation to work on other things.

Too true. However, it is still important IMHO to review at least at
this level before publishing: this is the most public component of
FFmpeg, and it should be professional.

>
> -compn
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list