[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] logo replacement news

[Herve Flores]

Le 2 juin 2011 à 00:23, Stefano Sabatini a écrit :

> On date Wednesday 2011-06-01 22:04:07 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
>> Hi
>> 
>> As we have replaced the logo we should mention this on the HP
>> 
>> Ill push the patch soon, so please comment soon
>> 
>> -- 
>> Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
>> 
>> The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the
>> dead. -- Aristotle 
> 
>> From d33d11fc9cc95b089d0c999434224c4330d06447 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:00:19 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] Update due to logo replacement
>> 
>> ---
>> src/index |    2 ++
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/src/index b/src/index
>> index d840001..2e0a984 100644
>> --- a/src/index
>> +++ b/src/index
>> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ Today FFmpeg has received the <a href="threat1.png">first legal threat</a> in it
>> from a previous root admin of FFmpeg, who now is root admin of the
>> Libav fork of FFmpeg. He claims copyright on the zigzag part of our
>> logo. It has to be noted that he said 4 years ago <a href="http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/44742"><quote>Credit to whoever came up with the zigzag idea</quote></a></p>
> 
>> +<p><i>Update May 31/June 1:</i>We have replaced the logo with a better looking one drawn by
>                                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Let the user to decide this for himself (and the two logos are in
> different styles, so it's not just a matter of "which looks better")

just wait a a little before this update
I will end it first

so I will made a "contract/cession" (to be more official)
if somebody with a better english level (Baptiste?) could correct it, it would be great :-)

and a "white sheet" (…a stupid how-to-use-logo made by all advertising companies for their clients)

After this, you could push your update (and add a link to download the whole files for example, with sources and the rights you give to the end user. Personnally I'll give all rights to you, but you don't have to give all to the end user, eg: you could change the logo as its owner, but end-user does not have to ;-))

PS: do you have a "legal structure", an association, etc? who/what will be the legal owner?
PPS: juridic is a bull***t, so we have to well define "everything" to avoid anymore trouble ;-)

>> +Herve Flores.</p>
>   ^^^^^
> 
> Hervé

I don't mind about the "é", do whatever you want ;-)

bye

Hervé

--------------------
http://www.whynotflores.com
--------------------