[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Cosmetics: sort dependencies for doc/ffmpeg.pod and doc/ffmpeg.html.

[Måns Rullgård]

Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:

> On date Monday 2011-01-31 15:35:39 +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd encoded:
>> Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:
>> 
>> > ---
>> >  Makefile |    2 +-
>> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> > index 2658a30..306075c 100644
>> > --- a/Makefile
>> > +++ b/Makefile
>> > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ documentation: $(addprefix doc/, developer.html faq.html general.html libavfilte
>> >
>> >  $(HTMLPAGES) $(PODPAGES): doc/fftools-common-opts.texi
>> >
>> > -doc/ffmpeg.pod doc/ffmpeg.html: doc/demuxers.texi doc/bitstream_filters.texi doc/eval.texi doc/indevs.texi doc/filters.texi doc/outdevs.texi doc/protocols.texi doc/metadata.texi
>> > +doc/ffmpeg.pod doc/ffmpeg.html: doc/bitstream_filters.texi doc/demuxers.texi doc/eval.texi doc/filters.texi doc/indevs.texi doc/metadata.texi doc/outdevs.texi doc/protocols.texi
>> >  doc/ffplay.pod doc/ffplay.html: doc/demuxers.texi doc/eval.texi doc/indevs.texi doc/filters.texi doc/outdevs.texi doc/protocols.texi
>> >  doc/ffprobe.pod doc/ffprobe.html: doc/demuxers.texi doc/indevs.texi doc/protocols.texi
>> >  doc/libavfilter.html: doc/filters.texi
>> > -- 
>> > 1.7.2.3
>> 
>> Those lists seem to share many entries.  Could they be factored out
>> into a variable?  That would make the whole thing a lot easier to
>> comprehend.
>
> Overkill, the documented components depends on the features of each
> single program (basically, everything for ffmpeg, only
> decoding+filtering stuff for ffplay, just decoding for ffprobe).

Fine, I'll just do it myself then.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com