[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Cosmetics: sort dependencies for doc/ffmpeg.pod and doc/ffmpeg.html.

[Stefano Sabatini]

On date Monday 2011-01-31 15:35:39 +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd encoded:
> Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala at poste.it> writes:
> 
> > ---
> >  Makefile |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index 2658a30..306075c 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ documentation: $(addprefix doc/, developer.html faq.html general.html libavfilte
> >
> >  $(HTMLPAGES) $(PODPAGES): doc/fftools-common-opts.texi
> >
> > -doc/ffmpeg.pod doc/ffmpeg.html: doc/demuxers.texi doc/bitstream_filters.texi doc/eval.texi doc/indevs.texi doc/filters.texi doc/outdevs.texi doc/protocols.texi doc/metadata.texi
> > +doc/ffmpeg.pod doc/ffmpeg.html: doc/bitstream_filters.texi doc/demuxers.texi doc/eval.texi doc/filters.texi doc/indevs.texi doc/metadata.texi doc/outdevs.texi doc/protocols.texi
> >  doc/ffplay.pod doc/ffplay.html: doc/demuxers.texi doc/eval.texi doc/indevs.texi doc/filters.texi doc/outdevs.texi doc/protocols.texi
> >  doc/ffprobe.pod doc/ffprobe.html: doc/demuxers.texi doc/indevs.texi doc/protocols.texi
> >  doc/libavfilter.html: doc/filters.texi
> > -- 
> > 1.7.2.3
> 
> Those lists seem to share many entries.  Could they be factored out
> into a variable?  That would make the whole thing a lot easier to
> comprehend.

Overkill, the documented components depends on the features of each
single program (basically, everything for ffmpeg, only
decoding+filtering stuff for ffplay, just decoding for ffprobe).
-- 
FFmpeg = Furious & Fast Most Peaceful Elaborated Gorilla