[FFmpeg-devel] xvmc_render.h ---> xvmc.h

[Ivan Kalvachev]

On 2/11/09, Benoit Fouet <benoit.fouet at free.fr> wrote:
> On 02/11/2009 04:17 PM, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>> On 2/11/09, Benoit Fouet <benoit.fouet at free.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/11/2009 01:04 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:06:33PM +0100, Benoit Fouet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 02/09/2009 12:58 PM, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/9/09, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:00:52AM +0100, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:20:02AM +0200, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I still oppose the change as it brings more confusion
>>>>>>>>> and have no advantages of any sort.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This seems a funny argument, considering _render is used nowhere
>>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>>> (so it is a mystery what it is supposed to signify), and even if
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i dont want to disturb you guys while trying to repaint the bike but
>>>>>>> what about vdpau_pixfmt.h ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do you dare to give actually reasonable proposition! ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I still prefer _render as something done by 3D render,
>>>>>> however I cannot deny that this header contains structures placed
>>>>>> in pixfmt buffers and passed only when this pixel format is used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just hope it won't be confused with PixFmtInfo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> has Michael's proposal been completely forgotten ?
>>>>> it looks nice when you look at the file content.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I just asked whether there is
>>>>
>>>>   Anybody who prefers xvmc_pixfmt.h over xmvc.h?
>>>>
>>>> Are you such a person?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> yes... but I don't think it matters much...
>>>
>>
>> Does this also mean that you are OK with keeping the things as they are
>> now?
>> But if there is some _really good reason_ for change you'd prefer
>> xvmc_pixfmt.
>> (please give full answer, not just yes/no;)
>>
>
> if this file has to be renamed for one reason or another (I must admit
> that right now, this just looks like details to me), I'd prefer it to be
> renamed in the longer form Michael proposed than in the shorter form
> that Diego proposed...
> Is that a long enough answer ? :)

Yes, thank you very much.
I guess most people feel this way (including me).